22. avg 2021.

Investigators Into Serbian Journalist’s Murder ‘Still in Danger’

Police probing the 1999 murder of the famous journalist Slavko Curuvija still face real security risks, the head of the Serbian Commission Investigating Murders of Journalists has said.

The Chairman of Serbia’s Commission for Investigating Murders of Journalists during Slobodan Milosevic’s regime, Veran Matic, told BIRN that investigators still face grave risks doing their job.

There are security risks especially for Dragan Kecman, the head of the police working group for solving the murder of Slavko Curuvija, and for some other people involved in solving murder cases about journalists, Matic said in a written statement.

“Since more intensive work began on shedding light on the Curuvija case, there have been various findings about the danger posed to members of the Working Groups or the members of the Commission for Investigating Murders of Journalists,” he explained. “Certainly the most common target has been inspector Kecman,” Matic added.

Curuvija, a prominent journalist and editor, was shot dead outside his home in Belgrade in April 1999 during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, allegedly because of his outspoken criticism of President Milosevic. The retrial in this case is still ongoing. On September 13, defence lawyers should start their closing arguments.

The original indictment did not identify who ordered the killing but only said Radomir Markovic, then head of Serbian State Security, abetted the crime, and three security service officers – Ratko Romic, Milan Radonjic and Miroslav Kurak – took part in the organisation and execution of the murder. Kurak was named the direct perpetrator, and Romic as his accomplice.

Markovic, Radonjic and Romic pleaded not guilty, while Kurak is on the run and is being tried in absentia.

When it came to who committed the murder, the first-instance verdict in the Curuvija trial in April 2019 diverged from the indictment by saying that the journalist was killed by an “unknown perpetrator”, rather than by Kurak.

The introduction of the “unknown perpetrator” into the verdict was why the Belgrade Appeal Court quashed it, and ordered a retrial.

The weekly magazine Vreme on Thursday reported that a meeting was held in Belgrade in 2006, at which, according to the police document Vreme quoted, Kurak was present and said: “Kecman needs to be cooled”, i.e. liquidated. The weekly magazine NIN published similar information about this meeting in 2018.

Matic confirmed to Vreme that during 2016 there was information circulating “that the murder of Inspector Kecman was arranged abroad”. The Commission requested a security assessment and received information that “there is no knowledge about this”.

“After Kecman informed me of the names associated with that information, we agreed to conduct interviews ourselves with the person mentioned as the [murder] organizer. In that conversation in 2017, the alleged organiser denied any connection with that information and any organisation of the murder”, Matic told Vreme.

“It was only after this conversation that we were able, by inspecting the police intelligence document, to make sure that the information was indeed recorded and that it was available to those who worked on security,” he added.

Ostavljanje komentara je privremeno obustavljeno iz tehničkih razloga. Hvala na razumevanju.

Send this to a friend